Work Smart Series

Due to upcoming technology upgrades, all purchases of the November and/or December Work Smart sessions must be completed no later than December 31, 2024. Please watch for the next Work Smart Series workshop coming June 2025.

 


December 2024
Strengthening Employee Value through Sustainability Practices

 

Date:

Wednesday, December 4, 2024


Time:

11 a.m. to 2 p.m. ET


Workshop Coordinators:

Ian Katz and Terri McNelly


CE Credits: 

Details can be found on the Work Smart Series CE page.


Learning Objectives:

  • Describe what Employee Green Behaviors are and at least 3 reasons why they are essential for successful implementation of sustainability efforts in organizations.
  • Describe at least 4 ways organizations can leverage leadership and change management principles to embed sustainability into the organizational culture.
  • Explain positive impacts of green behavior on employee outcomes.
  • Clarify and develop the most critical capabilities of a green leader.
  • Develop an action plan that fosters a personal sense of ownership and responsibility toward sustainability in the workplace.

Detailed Description:

In today’s competitive landscape, an emphasis on the Triple Bottom Line (i.e., financial, social, and environmental performance) is essential for organizational success. In this workshop, attendees will explore evidence-based strategies for integrating sustainable practices into organizational culture, learn how to effectively communicate and execute these initiatives, and discover the role of employee behavior as the core to the success of these initiatives. By prioritizing sustainability, organizations contribute to the value proposition to drive both employee satisfaction and retention and long-term organizational success.


Presenters

Beth Anne McPheeters's headshotBeth Anne McPheeters

Beth Anne is an innovative, strategic thinker who sees the possibilities and answers to complex problems where others can’t or don’t. She serves as the Executive Director, Corporate Reputation for Syneos Health with responsibility for executing against the company’s Environmental, Social and Governance corporate strategy. With a Bachelor of Arts in Journalism from the University of Georgia, Beth Anne has served in Brand Marketing and Strategy roles before moving into Corporate Social Responsibility in 2019 and establishing the company’s first strategic approach to enabling a sustainable organizational culture. She brings a creative, analytical mindset to be a continual source of new ideas and approaches to lead the implementation of game-changing solutions.

 

Mano RamakrishnanMano Ramakrishnan

Mano is a skilled facilitator, thoughtful coach and creative researcher who is looking to create positive impact – especially in the areas of environmental sustainability and social inclusion. With a Ph.D. in I-O Psychology from Akron, he is an experienced scientist-practitioner in the fields of leadership development, inclusion and organizational psychology. In his years working in the US and abroad in various consulting and leadership roles, he has built a track record of developing enduring relationships, fostering collective creativity and delivering exceptional results. He is an experienced public speaker, innovative researcher and inspiring executive coach.

 

Evan Sinar's headshotHannes Zacher

Hannes Zacher is a Professor of Work and Organizational Psychology at Leipzig University in Germany. He earned his Ph.D. from the University of Giessen and subsequently worked in academic positions in Germany, Australia, and the Netherlands. In his research program, Hannes investigates various topics, including organizational environmental sustainability. Across these research agendas, he employs multiple methodologies, including experimental, longitudinal, and meta-analytic studies. His research is well supported through competitive grants and industry funding. Hannes has published over 200 articles in international journals and serves on several editorial boards. Since 2024, he is Editor-in-Chief of Psychology and Aging, the premier outlet for the psychological science of aging and adult lifespan development published by the American Psychological Association.

 

November 2024
Combating the Toxic Workplace

 

Date:

Wednesday, November 13, 2024


Time:

11 a.m. to 2 p.m. ET


Workshop Coordinators:

Megan VanHoy and Chia Lin-Ho


CE Credits: 

Details can be found on the Work Smart Series CE page.


Learning Objectives:

  • Identify five key indicators of a toxic work environment.
  • Explain the effects of workplace toxicity on work outcomes.
  • Apply two practical tools and strategies to address workplace toxicity.
  • Describe three ways to promote a healthy and inclusive workplace culture.

Detailed Description:

In today’s workplace, toxicity can undermine employee morale, productivity, and overall organizational health. This workshop will explore evidence-based strategies for identifying and addressing toxic behaviors and practices within the workplace. Attendees will learn the warning signs of a toxic workplace as well as practical tools for addressing toxicity and fostering a healthier work culture. By leveraging evidence-based approaches, organizations can transform their work environments and enhance both employee well-being and organizational success.


Presenters

Clair Kueny's headshotClair Reynolds Kueny

Clair Reynolds Kueny is the Department Chair and an Associate Professor of Psychological Science at Missouri University of Science and Technology. She also serves as the program director for the I-O graduate programs at Missouri S&T. She received her MS and PhD in Industrial-Organizational Psychology (with a concentration in quantitative behavior methods) from Saint Louis University. She specializes in applying organizational theories and research to specialized organizations including healthcare (particularly rural healthcare & oncology care), and higher education. Her research has also focused on unintended consequences of counterproductive work behaviors and proactive behavior at work. She has worked with a variety of teams and organizations (ranging from small businesses to healthcare to university leadership) to help them navigate interpersonal, leadership, and organizational-level dynamics. She is a member of Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (including a member of the prosocial I-O committee), American Psychological Association, and the Academy of Management, as well as serving as President of Gateway I-O Psychologists.

 

C. Allen Gorman's headshotC. Allen Gorman

C. Allen Gorman is an Associate Professor in the Department of Management, Information Systems, and Quantitative Methods in the Collat School of Business at UAB, where he teaches classes in Leadership and Human Resource Management. He is also the Chief Science Officer for Personality Pool, a human resource technology firm. His research interests fall within 5 broad domains: 1) job performance, 2) leadership, 3) training and development, 4) well-being at work, and 5) individual differences in work behavior. Allen's work has been published in outlets such as the Journal of Applied Psychology, Personnel Psychology, the Journal of Vocational Behavior, and the Journal of Business and Psychology. He is on the Editorial Boards of the Journal of Business and Psychology, Human Performance, and the Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, and he is a member of the Academy of Management, the Society for Human Resource Management, the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, the American Psychological Association, and the Association for Psychological Science.

 


Thank you to our Evaluation Partner!

Talent Metrics Consulting Logo

 

 


Recommend a Thought Leader

Do you know a SIOP practitioner or researcher who is…

  •   Doing work on topics of critical relevance in the “new normal”  of the workplace?
  •   With great speaking/facilitation skills?

This is a great opportunity to showcase their thought leadership by recommending them (or yourself!) to present at a future Work Smart Series event.  Email the Work Smart Team
 


Past Events Include:

  • Combating the Toxic Workplace (November 13, 2024), PURCHASE NOW
  • Understanding and Evaluating AI Solutions (August 14, 2024)
  • Evidence-Based Strategies for Building Inclusive Workplaces (May 22, 2024)
  • Coaching to Accelerate the Development of Learning Agility. (February 21, 2024)
  • Measuring the Impact of Leadership Development (November 8, 2023)
  • The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Employee Psychological Safety (August 23, 2023)
  • Workplace Mistreatment: Science and Solutions (May 24, 2023)
  • Stories That Move Us (February 16, 2023)
  • Coaching Trends: Passing Fads or Future Fixtures? (November 9, 2022)
  • I³: Inspiring, Inclusive, & Influential Communication (August 18, 2022)
  • The “Great R”:  Reality, Response and Reset in a Post-Pandemic Workplace (June 7, 2022)
  • Battling Burnout in 2022: What Can Organizations Do Beyond Encouraging Self-Care? –  featuring Dr. Jacinta Jiménez, author of The Burnout Fix (February 17, 2022)
  • 5 Macro Human Capital Trends Impacting the Workplace Today –  featuring well-known psychologist, writer, and innovator Dr. Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic (November 18, 2021)

 

 

Featured Articles:

Jenny Baker
/ Categories: TIP, 2023, 604

“Nobody Wants to Work Anymore”: Reflecting on I-O Psychology’s Assumptions and Values Through the Lens of the Antiwork Movement

Rebecca M. Brossoit, Louisiana State University, & Jacqueline R. Wong, Colorado State University

The antiwork movement provides a unique framework for I-O psychologists to consider their core assumptions and values about work and organizations. The antiwork movement is rooted in Marxist, socialist, anarchist, and feminist philosophies that critique capitalism and power in relation to work (Frayne, 2011; Seyferth, 2019; Shuster, 2022; Weeks, 2011). This movement calls attention to issues related to exploitative organizational practices that prioritize profit over people, inequities at work, and grind/hustle culture. Ultimately, the aim of the antiwork movement is to “problematize work as we know it today” (Reddit, 2022). However, the specific goals of the antiwork movement are broad and vary from shifting ideologies about the prioritization of work, to improving working conditions and workers’ rights, to abolishing work and organizations altogether. On Reddit, the r/antiwork subreddit community has 2.4 million members,1 and they describe their viewpoints as: “We’re not against effort, labor, or being productive. We’re against jobs as they are structured under capitalism and the state: Against economic relations, against hierarchical social relations at the workplace.” In this way, the notion that “nobody wants to work anymore,” may be better rephrased as “nobody wants to work like this anymore.” The antiwork movement, and particularly the subreddit associated with it, has gained significant attention over the last 2 years, as evidenced in news headlines (e.g., Aratani, 2021; Blair, 2022; Codrea-Rado, 2021; Davies, 2021; Flynn, 2022; Goldberg, 2021; Hunt, 2021; Majoo, 2021, O’Connor, 2022; Olivas, 2022, Pirnay, 2021; Todd, 2021) and across social media platforms.

The apparent absence of literature or discussions of antiwork within I-O psychology research and practice is surprising given our field’s focus on work and organizations. Therefore, we believe it is worthwhile for I-O psychologists to be aware of, and involved in, antiwork conversations. We recognize the relevant (though not explicitly “antiwork”) existing literature that has been engaged in noteworthy discussions of capitalism, power, and critical theory in I-O (e.g., Baritz, 1960; Gerard, 2017; Islam & Sanderson, 2022; Mumby, 2019; Woo et al., 2021). To build upon this, we offer reflection questions, informed by antiwork viewpoints and broader critical theory, for I-O psychologists to ponder and discuss. These questions are intended to stimulate critical thinking about our personal ideologies and assumptions about work and to help us clarify the professional identity of I-O psychologists and the field of I-O psychology.

  • How do antiwork ideas (e.g., critiques of capitalism, who holds power, and status quos in organizational practices and treatment of workers) impact I-O psychologists?
    • In what ways do antiwork ideas challenge I-O psychology research and practice? What would the field of I-O look like if work was restructured to deemphasize capital/profit? What role does I-O psychology research and practice play within the antiwork movement?
  • What is the purpose of work in the 21st century? (Hyland, 2023)
    • Why do we work—collectively and individually? Is the purpose of work to survive (i.e., meet basic needs)? To attain status or power? To provide meaning? To derive joy? Can these purposes be fulfilled through other means? If so, how does that change work? Who benefits from work?
  • Why is work structured the way it is (e.g., hours, days of the week, modality)?
    • Who decides how work is structured? Who benefits from this structure? What would alternative structures look like?
  • Do we expect everyone to work? (e.g., Mumby, 2019)
    • What assumptions do we hold about individuals who do not work? For whom is it socially acceptable to be unemployed? In what ways do those who choose not to work contribute to society? Is working the best way to contribute to society?
  • What type of work do we value? (e.g., Ashforth & Kriener, 1999; Duffy, 2007)
    • Who decides what type of work is valued? How is valued work rewarded? Who decides how it is rewarded? How do we view volunteer work, homecare tasks, or other forms of unpaid labor?
  • What is the purpose of rest? (e.g., Hersey, 2022)
    • Who is allowed to rest? When is rest discouraged or stigmatized? Is rest a human right?
  • What is the purpose of organizations?
    • Is the purpose of organizations to build profit? To benefit workers? To improve societal conditions (i.e., for the Earth and its inhabitants)? Who benefits from organizations?
  • Who holds power in organizations? (e.g., Fleming & Spicer, 2007; Fleming & Spicer, 2014; Magee & Galinsky, 2008)
    • Where does power come from? Can power be distributed differently or more equitably? What do organizations owe their workers? What do workers owe their organization?

Beyond these reflection questions, there are also unique antiwork research questions that I-O psychologists are equipped to answer, ideally with collaboration and input from others with relevant experience (e.g., labor unions, workers) and expertise (e.g., scholars in sociology, anthropology, philosophy, communications, feminist studies, and/or political science), some of whom have already made headway on studying the movement and related areas like resistance in organizations (e.g., Fleming, 2015; Fleming & Spicer, 2010; Frayne, 2011, 2015; Mumby, 2005; Seyferth, 2019; Shuster, 2022; Spicer & Fleming, 2016; Weeks, 2011). Research-related questions stemming from the antiwork movement may include:

  • How is the antiwork movement related to other recent labor-related phenomena, such as large-scale strikes, the Great Resignation, and quiet quitting? (e.g., Olivas, 2022; Shuster, 2022)
  • How is the antiwork movement related to broader societal issues, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, economic conditions, climate change, and political unrest? (e.g., Aratani, 2021)
  • How can theory help us understand the antiwork movement? What theories are relevant to antiwork (e.g., critical theory, equity theory, ERG theory, resistance theory)?
  • How does the antiwork movement fit into, or contrast with, I-O topic areas related to vocational interests, calling, meaningful work, burnout, or organizational commitment?
  • In what ways can antiwork viewpoints and philosophies influence industries, organizational practices (e.g., reconsideration of policies, procedures, or treatment of workers), and/or employees (e.g., cynicism, turnover)?

Conclusion

We view the antiwork movement as a noteworthy sociohistorical event that is prompting critical thinking, conversations, and questions that are relevant to the field of I-O psychology. Specifically, we believe that reflecting on these questions will help us, as individuals and as a collective field, be more intentional about shaping the world of work we envision. I-Os can use the antiwork movement as a framework for contemplating their assumptions and values, for developing unique and timely research questions, and for thinking creatively and flexibly about the purpose of modern work and organizations.

Note

[1]As pointed out by a reviewer, it is impossible to guarantee that all members of the subreddit community can be authenticated or share similar views of antiwork.

References

Aratani, L. (2021, November 28). Goodbye to the job: How the pandemic changed Americans’ attitude toward work. https://www.theguardian.com/money/2021/nov/28/goodbye-to-job- how-the-pandemic-changed-americans-attitude-to-work

Ashforth, B. E., & Kreiner, G. E. (1999). “How can you do it?”: Dirty work and the challenge of constructing a positive identity. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 413-434.

Baritz, L. (1960). The servants of power: A history of the use of social science in American industry. Wesleyan University Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/11283-000

Blair, D. (2022, January 26). Meet the 1.6 million “redditors” who want to abolish work. https://www.dailysignal.com/2022/01/26/meet-1-6-million-redditors-who-want-to-        abolish-work/

Codrea-Rado, A. (2021, December 22). Inside the online movement to end work. https://www.vice.com/ en/article/y3vwjw/inside-the-online-movement-to-end-work-antiwork-sub-reddit

Davies, P. (2021, November 25). Reddit’s r/antiwork subreddit is boycotting Black Friday and e-commerce giants such as Amazon. https://www.euronews.com/next/2021/11/25/reddit-s-r-antiwork-subreddit-is-boycotting-black-friday-and-e-commerce-giants-such-as-ama

Duffy, M. (2007). Doing the dirty work: Gender, race, and reproductive labor in historical perspective. Gender & Society, 21(3), 313-336.

Fleming, P. (2015). Resisting work: The corporatization of life and its discontents. Temple University Press.

Fleming, P., & Spicer, A. (2010). Contesting the corporation: Struggle, power and resistance in organizations. Cambridge University Press.

Fleming, P., & Spicer, A. (2014). Power in management and organization science. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 237-298.

Flynn, S. (2022, January 27). The Reddit antiwork saga–and whether there’s really a world without jobs. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/antiwork-quit-job-pandemic-reddit-b2002265.html

Frayne, D. (2011). Critical social theory and the will to happiness: A study of anti-work subjectivities [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Cardiff University.

Frayne, D. (2015). The refusal of work: The theory and practice of resistance to work. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Gerard, N. (2017). Handmaidens to capitalism. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 10(3), 410–414.

Goldberg, E. (2021, December 4). Public displays of resignation: Saying “i quit” loud and proud. https://web.archive.org/web/20211204101013/https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/04/business/public-resignation-quitting.html

Hersey, T. (2022). Rest is resistance: A manifesto. Little, Brown Spark.

Hunt, E. (2021, October 27). Ready to quit your job? Come and join me in the anti-work movement. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/oct/27/quit-your-job-join-anti-work-movement-elle-hunt

Hyland, P. (2023). All we like sheep: The need for reflection and reflexivity in I-O psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Research and Practice.

Islam, G., & Sanderson, Z. (2022). Critical positions: Situating critical perspectives in work and organizational psychology. Organizational Psychology Review, 12(1), 3–34.

Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Social hierarchy: The self‐reinforcing nature of power and status. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 351-398.

Majoo, F. (2021, October 22). Even with a dream job, you can be antiwork. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/22/opinion/work-resignations-covid.html

Mumby, D. K. (2005). Theorizing resistance in organization studies: A dialectical approach. Management communication quarterly, 19(1), 19-44.

Mumby, D. K. (2019). Work: What is it good for? (Absolutely nothing)—A critical theorist’s perspective. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 12(4), 429–443.

O’Connor, B. (2022, January 27). The rise of the anti-work movement. BBC. https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20220126-the-rise-of-the-anti-work-movement

Olivas, B. (2022, January 28). r/Anti-work and the need for revolutionary organization. https://socialistrevolution.org/r-antiwork-and-the-need-for-revolutionary-organization/

Pirnay, E. (2021, February 15). Inside the Reddit community calling for the abolition of work “unemployment for all!.” https://www.huckmag.com/art-and-culture/inside-the-reddit-community-calling-for-the-abolition-of-work/

Reddit. (2022, November 1). Antiwork: Unemployment for all, not just the rich! https://www.reddit.com/r/antiwork/wiki/index/#wiki_frequently_asked_questions

Seyferth, P. (2019). Antiwork: A stab in the heart of capitalism. In R. Kinna & U. Gordon (Eds.), Routledge handbook of radical politics (pp 374-390). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315619880

Shuster, N. (2022, September 15-18). Big-box retail workers, the great resignation, and the anti-work movement [Paper presentation.] American Political Science Association 2022, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Spicer, A., & Fleming, P. (2016). Resisting the 24/7 work ethic: Shifting modes of regulation and refusal in organized employment. Sage Handbook of Resistance, 121-134.

Todd, S. (2021, December 20). What Reddit’s million-strong antiwork community can teach the rest of us. https://qz.com/work/2103779/reddits-antiwork-sub-has-mainstream-appeal

Weeks, K. (2011). The problem with work: Feminism, Marxism, antiwork politics, and postwork imaginaries. Duke University Press.

Woo, V. A., Schmidt, G. B., Aiken, J. R., Islam, S., Albeg, A. C., DePatie, T. P., Gelesko, G., & Voss, J. (2021). Where no one has gone before. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 14(1-2), 55–60.

Print
3811 Rate this article:
5.0

 

Purchase the November Work Smart Series workshop!

Purchase
November's workshop

 

Purchase the December Work Smart Series workshop!

Purchase
December's workshop

 

 


About the Series


This SIOP offering provides virtual learning programs with exceptional content AND opportunities for meaningful, memorable interaction. The series is also intended to increase the visibility of industrial and organizational psychology and will be open to both SIOP members and nonmembers.

The world of work is in a period of rapid change and as I-O psychologists we have much to offer for creating a smarter workplace. In addition to participating yourself, we strongly encourage you to be SIOP ambassadors and invite non-member colleagues to take advantage of the Work Smart learning opportunities.

There is no better time to leverage the science of I-O psychology to make a difference! We hope you join us for [GREAT] Content + [FUN] Connection!

If you have any questions regarding the Work Smart Series or would like more information, please contact the Work Smart Team.


Become a Sponsor

This is an opportunity to sponsor creative, timely discussions on Work Smart series topics! Learn more: Work Smart Series Sponsorship Program


SIOP Work Smart Series Committee

Ali O'Malley (Chair)
Sarah Thomas (Chair-in-Training)
Chia-Lin Ho
Ian Katz
Terri McNelly
Crystal Turner
Jean Stetz-Puchalski
Megan Van Hoy